Blockwalk |
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/egypt.htm
World Culture versus Blind Faith
The ‘world culture’ of the Greeks brought Egyptian mythology, Indian metaphysics
and Greek philosophy into direct contact with each other, giving birth to a
syncretic method of enquiry, an intellectual movement to gain knowledge or
‘gnosis’ from nature itself. If Gnosticism was a ‘religion’ then it was one that
held to a fantastic if ultimately vain hope: that a place could be found for all
of knowledge and human experience. Its very liberalism and inclusiveness placed
Gnosticism directly at odds with all who argued for faith and a blind and
unquestioning acceptance of dogma. Later Christianity was to stigmatise
Gnosticism as a ‘heresy’ but in fact it pre-dates the established church by
centuries.
Gnosticism embraced many schools of thought, and within it even some Jews could
find a theological niche. Simon Magus (‘Simon the Magician’) was one – in later
centuries, stigmatised by the Christians in the sin of 'simony' (the buying and
selling of ecclesiastical favours). Simon Magus was apparently Nero’s court
magician and a leading light among the Jews of Rome. Not only did Jewish cities
adopt Hellenic styles of architecture but, after centuries without schools and
academies, the Jews embraced the value of literacy.
Unlike the Greeks however, most ‘practicing’ Jews never questioned texts
critically but elevated them as sacred objects in their own right, to be revered
and ‘close-read’ for hidden meaning. This ferreting out of subtleties – or
contorting old words for new purposes – was called ‘midrash’, a particular gift
of the priesthood. But the process began of rewriting even the sacred texts into
the language of the Greeks, the lingua franca of the Mediterranean world. But
whilst they might ‘borrow’ from the conqueror, the Jewish priesthood, a ruling
caste of several thousand and the personification of social exclusion and
theocratic privilege, recoiled in horror at Greek attempts to integrate them
into their world.
The Natives are Restless (and hoping for a Jewish 'Alexander')
The most significant event to occur in the province of Judaea in the first
century of direct Roman rule did not involve any miraculous birth, death and
‘resurrection’ of a godman, but rather, was the vicious war waged by Roman
legions against rebellious Jewish ‘nationalists.’ What drove the Jews into
suicidal confrontation with the legions of Rome? With Herod’s death, Judaea had
first come under direct Roman rule in 6 AD and from then on the pace of
Romanisation quickened. The Jews themselves were fragmented by this process.
Many Jews, particularly in the rich cities of the ‘diaspora’, enjoyed a higher
prosperity than ever and were decidedly pro-Roman. Others doggedly resisted
assimilation. The more extreme of these ‘traditionalists’ castigated not only
their conquerors but also the temple priesthood.
The Jews, in fact, had long been a divided people. In Samaria, a rival temple
and Yahweh cult existed at Mount Gerizim, established in the days of the
Maccabees by Jews who rejected any ‘Law’ later than the five books of Moses. For
them, Moses was the sole legitimate prophet of Israel, and imminently, he would
return as the Messiah. These Jews were actually descendants of Assyrian
settlers, who were outside the ‘racial purity’ sought by the Jews of Judaea.
Hence, Samaritans were regarded by them as both religiously and racially
inferior, as counterfeit Jews
Philo of Alexandria
Philo intellectualised these thoughts. He was a Hellenized Jew, much influenced
both by Greek philosophy and Egyptian religious ideas (famously, his nephew
apostatised, took the name Tiberias Julius Alexander, and became Roman governor
of Egypt.) His own philosophy was a re-worked mix of the speculations of
Heraclitus (535-475 BC) and an ancient Egyptian idea that the unknowable godhead
existed in the realm of ‘plenitude’ or Pleroma .
The godhead, said Philo, gave existence to various ‘emanations’ or subordinate
gods that could be known. These emanations (‘aeons’ or ‘archons’) created and
governed the world. Philo identified several: the Logos (The Word or logic );
Sophia (Wisdom) – already present in Judaism, probably as a residual element of
the time when Yahweh had a female consort; Nous (Mind); Phronesis (Judgement);
and Dynamis (Power). Thus the supreme god’s will, justice, power, etc., made its
presence felt through these ‘emanations’, which might take various forms.
The Logos was present in the Egyptian pantheon, identified with the god Horus/Serapis,
and similarly, in Stoic philosophy which held that the Logos made itself
manifest through various gods – Zeus, Hermes, etc. The Stoics, who originated in
4th century BC Athens and took their name from the stoa, or meeting hall – were
the first thoroughgoing pantheists, holding that ‘God is the universe, the
universe is God.’ For Stoics, a wise and virtuous person learns his place in the
scheme of things. Stoicism, ironically, was to influence both the Roman
intelligentsia and the emerging Christians it held in contempt. The stoic
philosopher Seneca became tutor to the young Nero and a century later, the
emperor Marcus Aurelius was himself a Stoic philosopher.